The Supervision Disconnect:

Bridging the Gap Between Clinical Oversight and Authentic Professional Growth

By Sheamus Moran, Seasoned Substance Use Disorder Clinician

Clinical supervision stands as one of the foundational pillars of professional development in mental health and substance use disorder treatment. Yet, for many practicing clinicians, the weekly or bi-weekly supervision meeting has become something to endure rather than embrace mandatory checkbox in professional compliance rather than a catalyst for growth. This disconnect between the intended purpose of supervision and its lived reality represents a critical failure in our field, one that not only diminishes professional satisfaction but ultimately impacts client care.

The problem runs deeper than scheduling conflicts or personality mismatches. At its core, the supervision crisis reflects a fundamental misalignment between what seasoned clinicians need for their continued development and what traditional supervision models provide. This gap becomes particularly pronounced in specialized fields like substance use disorder treatment, where the complexity of client presentations and the unique demands of the work require a more nuanced, flexible approach to professional guidance.

The Mechanics of Disconnection

When Supervision Becomes Performance Theater

Too often, clinical supervision operates as an elaborate performance where both parties play predetermined roles. The supervisor assumes the position of knowledge holder, armed with theoretical frameworks and regulatory checklists. The supervisee becomes the dutiful student, nodding appropriately while internally cataloging the ways this structured conversation fails to address their actual challenges.

This dynamic creates what many clinicians describe as "textbook supervision", interactions that feel lifted directly from graduate school coursework rather than tailored to the messy, complex realities of clinical practice. When a supervisor responds to a clinician's struggle with a particularly challenging client by reciting basic motivational interviewing principles or suggesting they "review the stages of change model," the disconnect becomes palpable. The clinician recognizes these same theories they mastered in their 100 and 200-level courses, now repackaged as professional wisdom.

The Cliché Echo Chamber

Perhaps nothing undermines the supervisory relationship more effectively than the deployment of well-worn clinical clichés. When supervisors fall back on phrases like "meet the client where they are" or "trust the process" without contextualizing these concepts within the specific challenges being discussed, they inadvertently communicate that they either don't understand the complexity of the situation or don't believe it merits deeper consideration.

Experienced clinicians can spot these recycled platitudes immediately. They represent a lazy form of supervision that substitutes memorized soundbites for genuine engagement with the clinical material. The supervisee, having likely learned and used these same phrases themselves, experiences a profound sense of professional infantilization. They came seeking consultation between peers and instead received a lecture appropriate for someone just beginning their clinical journey.

The Procedural Trap

Modern supervision has become increasingly proceduralized, driven by regulatory requirements, liability concerns, and institutional standardization efforts. While structure serves important purposes, an over-reliance on checklists and mandatory discussion topics can suffocate the organic problem-solving conversations that drive real professional growth.

Consider the typical supervision session: review of caseload numbers, discussion of documentation compliance, mandatory safety assessments, review of treatment plans, and perhaps—if time permits—a brief exploration of clinical challenges. This format prioritizes administrative oversight over professional development, leaving little room for the kind of deep, collaborative thinking that transforms clinical practice.

The Unique Challenges of Substance Use Disorder Supervision

Beyond Traditional Clinical Models

Substance use disorder treatment operates in a unique professional ecosystem that traditional clinical supervision models often fail to address adequately. The field attracts a diverse workforce that includes licensed clinicians, peer recovery specialists, former clients turned counselors, and professionals from various educational backgrounds. This "menagerie of individuals," as one might characterize it, brings tremendous lived experience and authentic connection to the work, but also requires supervision approaches that can honor different types of expertise.

The traditional clinical supervision model, developed primarily within medical and psychological frameworks, operates on assumptions that don't necessarily align with the realities of addiction treatment. These models typically assume a hierarchical knowledge transfer from supervisor to supervisee, with the supervisor positioned as the expert dispensing wisdom derived from academic training and clinical experience. In substance use disorder treatment, however, the knowledge base is far more complex and multifaceted.

Consider the peer recovery specialist who has navigated their own journey through addiction and recovery. They possess intimate knowledge of the stages of change, not from textbook study but from lived experience. They understand the internal dialogue of ambivalence, the weight of shame, and the complexity of motivation in ways that purely academic training cannot provide. When subjected to traditional supervision that emphasizes diagnostic criteria and evidence-based interventions without acknowledging this experiential expertise, these professionals may feel diminished and misunderstood.

Traditional supervision models also tend to prioritize pathology-based assessment and diagnosis-driven treatment planning. While these elements certainly have their place in comprehensive addiction treatment, they can overshadow the relational, motivational, and harm-reduction approaches that often prove most effective in substance use contexts. The medical model's emphasis on symptom reduction and treatment compliance may conflict with harm reduction philosophies that meet clients where they are without judgment or predetermined expectations of abstinence.

The Complexity of Professional Identity in Addiction Treatment

The addiction treatment field presents unique challenges around professional identity that traditional supervision rarely addresses effectively. Unlike other clinical specialties where professional roles tend to be clearly defined and hierarchical, addiction treatment often blurs these boundaries in productive but complex ways.

The person in recovery who becomes a counselor occupies a particularly complex professional space. They must navigate the delicate balance between using their lived experience as a therapeutic tool while maintaining appropriate professional boundaries. Traditional supervision, with its emphasis on maintaining clinical distance and avoiding dual relationships, may not provide adequate guidance for these nuanced situations. When supervisors default to rigid boundary interpretations without understanding the unique dynamics of recovery communities, they may inadvertently undermine the authentic connections that make these professionals so effective.

Similarly, the licensed clinician working alongside peer recovery specialists must learn to collaborate as equals despite different educational backgrounds and credentialing paths. Traditional supervision models, which often emphasize hierarchy based on degrees and licenses, may not adequately prepare supervisors to facilitate these collaborative relationships or to recognize and utilize the different types of expertise each professional brings.

The Inadequacy of Diagnostic-Driven Supervision

Traditional clinical supervision often centers around diagnostic formulations and treatment planning based on formal assessment procedures. In substance use disorder treatment, however, this approach may miss the mark entirely. The complexity of addiction rarely fits neatly into diagnostic categories, and the most effective interventions often have little to do with formal diagnosis and everything to do with relationship, motivation, and timing.

When supervision focuses primarily on ensuring proper diagnostic procedures and evidence-based treatment selection, it may neglect the crucial elements that actually drive successful outcomes in addiction treatment. The ability to build rapport with someone who has been repeatedly let down by systems and relationships, the skill to recognize and respond to moments of readiness for change, and the wisdom to know when to push and when to simply be present—these competencies rarely appear in traditional supervision discussions.

The emphasis on diagnostic accuracy can also create artificial pressure to pathologize clients in ways that may be counterproductive to their recovery process. Many individuals with substance use disorders have experienced significant trauma, mental health challenges, and social marginalization. While acknowledging these realities is important, the diagnostic framework may inadvertently reinforce stigma and deficit-based thinking that undermines the hope and empowerment essential to recovery.

Cultural Competence and Community Connection

Substance use disorder treatment often occurs within specific cultural and community contexts that traditional supervision models may not adequately address. Many effective addiction treatment programs are deeply embedded in particular communities, whether defined by geography, culture, or shared experience. The professionals working in these settings often come from and remain connected to these communities in ways that blur traditional professional-client boundaries.

Traditional supervision, with its emphasis on professional distance and clear role boundaries, may not provide adequate guidance for navigating these community connections. When a counselor lives in the same neighborhood as their clients, shops at the same stores, and participates in the same recovery meetings, the traditional prohibitions against dual relationships become not just impractical but potentially harmful to both therapeutic effectiveness and community healing.

Furthermore, many substance use disorder treatment programs serve culturally specific populations with unique needs, values, and approaches to healing. Traditional supervision models, often developed within mainstream clinical contexts, may not provide adequate support for culturally responsive practice. When supervisors lack cultural competence or understanding of community-specific approaches to recovery, their guidance may inadvertently undermine culturally effective interventions.

The Trauma-Informed Care Imperative

The prevalence of trauma among individuals with substance use disorders necessitates trauma-informed approaches that traditional supervision models often fail to address adequately. While many supervisors may have received training in trauma-informed care principles, the application of these principles in addiction treatment settings requires specialized understanding that goes beyond general clinical training.

Trauma-informed addiction treatment recognizes that substance use often represents an attempt to cope with overwhelming experiences and emotions. This understanding fundamentally shifts the clinical approach from "What's wrong with you?" to "What happened to you?" However, traditional supervision models may continue to emphasize symptom management and behavior modification without adequately addressing the trauma dynamics that drive addictive behaviors.

Moreover, many professionals working in addiction treatment have their own trauma histories, whether related to their substance use, family experiences, or systemic marginalization. Traditional supervision rarely addresses how personal trauma history intersects with professional practice, missing opportunities to support practitioners in using their experiences therapeutically while maintaining their own psychological safety.

The Crisis of Authenticity in Clinical Relationships

Perhaps nowhere is the tension between traditional clinical training and effective practice more apparent than in the realm of authenticity and self-disclosure. Traditional clinical models emphasize maintaining professional distance, revealing little personal information, and serving as a "blank slate" for client projections. In addiction treatment, however, authenticity and appropriate self-disclosure often prove essential to building the trust and rapport necessary for effective intervention.

Clients with substance use disorders have often experienced significant betrayal, abandonment, and manipulation in their relationships. They may be particularly sensitive to perceived inauthenticity or professional facades. The ability to be genuine, vulnerable, and real within appropriate professional boundaries often makes the difference between effective therapeutic engagement and another failed treatment attempt.

Traditional supervision, however, may not provide adequate guidance for navigating this authenticity imperative. Supervisors trained in models that emphasize professional distance may discourage the kind of genuine human connection that proves most therapeutic in addiction treatment settings. When supervision focuses on maintaining traditional boundaries without understanding the unique relational needs of clients with substance use disorders, it may inadvertently undermine therapeutic effectiveness.

The Harm Reduction Philosophy Challenge

The growing recognition of harm reduction as an effective approach to substance use disorders presents additional challenges for traditional supervision models. Harm reduction philosophy emphasizes meeting clients where they are, reducing the negative consequences of substance use without necessarily requiring abstinence, and recognizing that recovery looks different for different people.

This philosophy often conflicts with traditional clinical models that emphasize treatment compliance, goal achievement, and measurable outcomes. When supervisors have not fully embraced harm reduction principles or lack understanding of how to implement them effectively, their supervision may inadvertently undermine this approach. Discussions about "treatment failure" or "non-compliance" may miss the harm reduction perspective that any positive change, however small, represents progress worth celebrating.

Furthermore, harm reduction approaches often require clinical flexibility and creativity that traditional supervision models may not support. The ability to adapt interventions to individual circumstances, to celebrate incremental progress, and to maintain hope in the face of repeated setbacks requires a different kind of clinical thinking than traditional problem-solving approaches.

The Integration Challenge: Blending Approaches Effectively

Perhaps the greatest challenge facing supervision in substance use disorder treatment is the need to integrate diverse approaches, philosophies, and types of expertise into coherent, effective practice. The field benefits from evidence-based interventions, lived experience wisdom, cultural knowledge, trauma-informed principles, harm reduction philosophy, and traditional clinical skills. However, traditional supervision models often lack the sophistication to help practitioners weave these elements together effectively.

When supervision focuses narrowly on one approach—whether evidence-based practice, peer recovery principles, or traditional clinical methods—it may miss opportunities to help practitioners develop the integrative skills necessary for effective addiction treatment. The ability to draw from multiple knowledge bases, to adapt interventions to individual circumstances, and to navigate competing approaches requires supervision that can model this integration rather than enforcing adherence to single-approach thinking.

This integration challenge is particularly acute for supervisors who may have strong expertise in one area but limited understanding of others. A supervisor with extensive training in cognitive-behavioral approaches may struggle to provide guidance to a peer recovery specialist whose interventions draw primarily from personal experience and community wisdom. Conversely, a supervisor with lived recovery experience may feel inadequately prepared to guide licensed clinicians in formal assessment and treatment planning procedures.

The solution requires supervision models that can honor and integrate diverse types of expertise while helping practitioners develop their own integrative capabilities. This means moving beyond traditional hierarchical models toward collaborative approaches that recognize the unique contributions each professional brings while supporting their continued growth and development.

Toward Supervision Models That Honor the Field's Complexity

The unique challenges of substance use disorder treatment require supervision approaches specifically designed to address this complexity. These models must be flexible enough to accommodate diverse professional backgrounds while sophisticated enough to address the multifaceted nature of addiction treatment.

Effective supervision in this field must recognize that expertise comes in many forms, that authentic relationships often prove more therapeutic than technically perfect interventions, and that cultural competence and community connection may be as important as clinical skills. It must provide guidance for navigating ethical complexities that traditional models never anticipated while supporting practitioners in developing their own integrative approaches to effective practice.

Most importantly, supervision in substance use disorder treatment must model the same principles that make treatment effective: meeting people where they are, building on existing strengths, maintaining hope in the face of challenges, and recognizing that growth and change happen in many different ways. When supervision embodies these principles, it becomes not just a regulatory requirement but a powerful tool for supporting the kind of professional development that ultimately serves clients and communities most effectively.

The Complexity of Dual Relationships and Personal Recovery

Many substance use disorder counselors bring their own recovery experience to the work, creating complex dynamics that traditional supervision rarely addresses effectively. When supervisors default to academic theories without acknowledging the unique perspective and potential vulnerabilities of counselors in recovery, they miss opportunities for meaningful professional development while potentially creating feelings of alienation or judgment.

The field's emphasis on personal disclosure, authentic relationship-building, and the use of self as a therapeutic tool requires supervision that can navigate these nuanced territories with sophistication and cultural competence. Cookie-cutter approaches to boundaries, self-disclosure, and professional relationships often prove inadequate in these contexts.

High-Stakes, Resource-Limited Environments

Substance use disorder treatment frequently occurs in under-resourced settings with high caseloads, crisis-driven interventions, and complex psychosocial presentations. Clinicians working in these environments need supervision that can help them prioritize effectively, manage professional stress, and develop creative solutions within significant constraints.

When supervision focuses on idealized treatment scenarios or theoretical best practices without acknowledging resource limitations and practical constraints, it fails to provide the pragmatic guidance that clinicians desperately need. The gap between supervision content and clinical reality becomes a source of frustration rather than professional growth.

The Leadership and Coaching Skills Gap

When Clinical Expertise Doesn't Translate to Supervision

Many clinical supervisors ascended to their roles based primarily on their clinical skills, advanced degrees, or years of experience in direct practice. While these qualifications certainly matter, they don't automatically confer the leadership, coaching, and adult learning skills necessary for effective supervision.

Excellent clinicians may struggle with providing constructive feedback, facilitating difficult conversations, or adapting their communication style to different learning preferences. They may default to the directive, expert-driven approach that works in client relationships but proves counterproductive when working with fellow professionals who need collaborative consultation rather than therapeutic intervention.

The Absence of Strengths-Based Supervision

Traditional supervision models often operate from a deficit-based perspective, focusing on what the supervisee needs to learn, correct, or improve. While growth areas certainly deserve attention, this approach can overlook the significant strengths, insights, and expertise that experienced clinicians bring to their work.

Effective supervision should function as a collaborative partnership that recognizes and builds upon existing competencies while addressing development needs. When supervisors fail to acknowledge and utilize the supervisee's strengths, they miss opportunities to create more engaging, relevant, and empowering supervision experiences.

Micro-Management vs. Professional Development

Some supervisors, particularly those new to the role or operating in highly regulated environments, may lean toward micro-management rather than professional development. This approach treats supervision as quality control rather than capacity building, focusing on compliance and error-prevention rather than skill enhancement and professional growth.

While oversight certainly forms part of the supervisory responsibility, when it dominates the relationship, it can create resentment, stifle creativity, and undermine the supervisee's sense of professional autonomy. Experienced clinicians, in particular, may find this approach patronizing and counterproductive.

The Dreaded Supervision Hour

When Professional Development Becomes Professional Burden

For many clinicians, supervision has evolved into something to be endured rather than anticipated. This transformation represents a significant failure of the supervisory system and a missed opportunity for professional enrichment. When clinicians describe dreading their supervision meetings, they're often articulating frustration with interactions that feel irrelevant, repetitive, or disrespectful of their professional experience.

This dread creates a negative cycle where both supervisor and supervisee approach the meeting with low expectations and minimal investment. The supervisee may prepare minimally, share selectively, and participate passively, while the supervisor may default to familiar formats and surface-level discussions to fill the required time.

The Information vs. Transformation Problem

Much of what passes for supervision focuses on information transfer rather than professional transformation. Supervisors may share articles, review policies, or explain procedures without connecting this information to the supervisee's specific development needs or current challenges.

Information-based supervision can be completed efficiently but rarely leads to meaningful professional growth. Transformation requires deeper engagement, reflection, and application—processes that demand more time, skill, and emotional investment from both parties.

Revisiting the Familiar

One of the most frequent complaints about supervision involves the tendency to repeatedly cover basic clinical concepts that experienced clinicians mastered years ago. When supervision sessions devolve into reviews of fundamental theories or basic clinical skills, they fail to meet the supervisee where they actually are in their professional development.

This approach not only wastes valuable time but can also communicate a lack of respect for the clinician's expertise and experience. It suggests that the supervisor either doesn't understand the supervisee's actual competency level or doesn't know how to provide guidance appropriate to their developmental stage.

Toward More Authentic and Effective Supervision

Embracing Solution-Focused Approaches

Effective supervision should model the same solution-focused, strengths-based approaches that we encourage in clinical practice. Rather than dwelling extensively on problems or deficits, supervision can identify what's working well and build upon existing successes.

This doesn't mean avoiding difficult conversations or areas for improvement, but rather approaching these discussions from a position of curiosity and collaboration rather than judgment and correction. Solution-focused supervision asks questions like "What would it look like if this challenge were resolved?" and "When have you successfully handled similar situations?"

Customizing Supervision to Individual Needs

One-size-fits-all supervision models fail to account for the diverse backgrounds, learning styles, and developmental needs of different clinicians. Effective supervisors assess their supervisees' strengths, growth areas, and preferences, then adapt their approach accordingly.

A seasoned clinician may benefit most from consultation-style discussions about complex cases, while a newer professional might need more structured skill-building activities. Someone with significant lived experience might require different support than someone with extensive academic training but limited real-world exposure.

Incorporating Adult Learning Principles

Clinical supervision should operate as adult education, recognizing that supervisees bring significant knowledge, experience, and expertise to the relationship. Adult learning principles emphasize collaboration, relevance, and application—elements often missing from traditional supervision approaches.

This means involving supervisees in setting learning objectives, connecting supervision content to their immediate practice challenges, and providing opportunities to apply new insights in their work. It also means respecting their ability to self-assess and take ownership of their professional development.

Building Genuine Relationships

Authentic supervision requires genuine human connection between supervisor and supervisee. This doesn't mean becoming friends or abandoning professional boundaries, but rather establishing relationships characterized by mutual respect, honest communication, and shared investment in professional growth.

When supervisors approach their role with curiosity about their supervisees' perspectives, appreciation for their expertise, and genuine interest in their success, they create conditions for meaningful professional development. This relational foundation makes difficult conversations possible and transformative rather than defensive and superficial.

Developing Supervisory Competence

Leadership Skills for Clinical Supervisors

Organizations should recognize that effective supervision requires distinct competencies beyond clinical expertise. Supervisors benefit from training in leadership skills, including communication, feedback delivery, conflict resolution, and team building.

These skills enable supervisors to navigate the complex dynamics inherent in supervisory relationships, address performance concerns constructively, and create environments conducive to professional growth. Without these competencies, even well-intentioned supervisors may struggle to provide effective guidance.

Coaching Approaches in Clinical Supervision

Incorporating coaching methodologies into clinical supervision can address many of the disconnection issues plaguing traditional approaches. Coaching emphasizes asking powerful questions rather than providing answers, helping supervisees discover their own solutions rather than imposing external fixes.

A coaching approach honors the supervisee's expertise while challenging them to think more deeply about their practice. It focuses on future possibilities rather than past problems and emphasizes action and accountability rather than analysis and advice.

Cultural Competence in Supervision

Effective supervision must account for the cultural, professional, and personal backgrounds that supervisees bring to the relationship. This includes understanding different communication styles, learning preferences, and professional values that may influence how supervision is experienced and utilized.

In substance use disorder treatment particularly, supervisors must demonstrate competence in working with diverse populations, including those with lived experience of addiction, trauma histories, and various cultural backgrounds. This competence extends beyond clinical knowledge to include supervision skills that can honor and utilize these different perspectives.

Practical Recommendations for Reform

Restructuring Supervision Formats

Organizations should consider moving beyond traditional weekly individual supervision to incorporate diverse formats that better meet varied needs. This might include group supervision for peer consultation, project-based supervision for specific initiatives, and intensive supervision periods for complex cases.

Technology can also enhance supervision through video review of client sessions, online consultation platforms, and digital resources for skill development. The key is matching supervision format to supervision purpose rather than defaulting to familiar approaches.

Developing Supervision Competency Standards

Professional organizations should establish clear competency standards for clinical supervisors, including requirements for supervision-specific training. This training should address adult learning principles, coaching skills, feedback delivery, and cultural competence in addition to clinical knowledge.

Regular evaluation of supervisory effectiveness, including feedback from supervisees, should become standard practice. This accountability ensures that supervision serves its intended purposes and provides opportunities for supervisors to improve their own skills.

Creating Supervision Partnerships

The most effective supervision relationships often function as partnerships between colleagues rather than hierarchical relationships between expert and novice. This partnership model recognizes that both parties bring valuable perspectives and can learn from each other.

Creating formal expectations around mutual respect, shared responsibility, and collaborative problem-solving can help establish these partnerships. Regular check-ins about the supervision relationship itself ensure that both parties remain engaged and satisfied with the process.

Reclaiming Supervision as Professional Enrichment

The widespread dissatisfaction with clinical supervision represents more than individual frustration—it signals a systemic failure to support professional development effectively. When experienced clinicians dread supervision or find it unhelpful, we waste valuable opportunities for growth, innovation, and job satisfaction.

Addressing this crisis requires fundamental shifts in how we conceptualize and implement clinical supervision. Rather than viewing it as quality control or compliance monitoring, we must embrace supervision as professional enrichment—an opportunity for collaborative problem-solving, skill enhancement, and career development.

This transformation demands investment in supervisor development, flexibility in supervision approaches, and commitment to authentic professional relationships. It requires moving beyond textbook interventions to engage with the complex realities of clinical practice, particularly in specialized fields like substance use disorder treatment.

The stakes of this transformation extend beyond professional satisfaction to client care itself. When clinicians receive supervision that energizes, challenges, and supports them, they bring enhanced skills, renewed motivation, and greater resilience to their clinical work. Their clients benefit from more effective interventions and more engaged therapeutic relationships.

The path forward requires courage from both supervisors and supervisees to move beyond comfortable but ineffective patterns toward more authentic and impactful professional relationships. It demands organizational support for supervision innovation and individual commitment to continuous improvement in supervisory practice.

Most importantly, it requires recognition that effective supervision is not about having all the answers but about asking better questions, creating safe spaces for honest reflection, and building partnerships that honor the complexity and humanity of clinical work. When we succeed in this transformation, supervision becomes what it was always meant to be—a cornerstone of professional excellence and a catalyst for meaningful growth.

The clinicians in our field deserve supervision that matches their dedication and expertise. Their clients deserve practitioners who are supported, challenged, and continuously developing their skills. The time has come to bridge the supervision gap and reclaim this essential element of professional practice as a source of enrichment rather than endurance.

Blog Post Title Two

It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

Don’t worry about sounding professional. Sound like you. There are over 1.5 billion websites out there, but your story is what’s going to separate this one from the rest. If you read the words back and don’t hear your own voice in your head, that’s a good sign you still have more work to do.

Be clear, be confident and don’t overthink it. The beauty of your story is that it’s going to continue to evolve and your site can evolve with it. Your goal should be to make it feel right for right now. Later will take care of itself. It always does.

Blog Post Title Three

It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

Don’t worry about sounding professional. Sound like you. There are over 1.5 billion websites out there, but your story is what’s going to separate this one from the rest. If you read the words back and don’t hear your own voice in your head, that’s a good sign you still have more work to do.

Be clear, be confident and don’t overthink it. The beauty of your story is that it’s going to continue to evolve and your site can evolve with it. Your goal should be to make it feel right for right now. Later will take care of itself. It always does.

Blog Post Title Four

It all begins with an idea. Maybe you want to launch a business. Maybe you want to turn a hobby into something more. Or maybe you have a creative project to share with the world. Whatever it is, the way you tell your story online can make all the difference.

Don’t worry about sounding professional. Sound like you. There are over 1.5 billion websites out there, but your story is what’s going to separate this one from the rest. If you read the words back and don’t hear your own voice in your head, that’s a good sign you still have more work to do.

Be clear, be confident and don’t overthink it. The beauty of your story is that it’s going to continue to evolve and your site can evolve with it. Your goal should be to make it feel right for right now. Later will take care of itself. It always does.